Additive manufacturing (AM) held a prominent place in the response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which was explicitly acknowledged by the FDA. The agency collaborated with other federal government agencies to encourage rapid innovation in manufacturing for the pandemic, but with the pandemic having come to a close, it may be time to examine the FDA’s standing guidance for AM.
If a traceability analysis isn't performed correctly or at the right time or frequency, gaps may go unnoticed that could negatively impact patient safety, device effectiveness, overall patient experience, regulatory submissions, and even result in a recall once the device is commercialized.
Predetermined change control plans (PCCPs) may be the way of the future for 510(k) medical device software, but the vast majority of both hardware and software device products still do not incorporate a PCCP. As a consequence, the FDA’s existing policies for when to file a new 510(k) are still in effect, and this blog will provide a closer look at the related guidances.
An updated guidance from the Medical Device Coordination Group (MDCG) explains the modifications that can be made to devices certified under the legacy regulatory system without rendering the device ineligible for the EU market.
One of the essential elements of this guidance is that the end-of-life/end-of-service (EOL/EOS) declaration for a software or firmware component can precipitate the same state for the medical device manufacturer’s (MDM’s) product, a problem that must be dealt with in advance to ensure that the MDM is not forced to prematurely withdraw its medical device.
While SBOMs may not fundamentally change your perspective on cybersecurity, they can be tremendously useful not just in managing cybersecurity across the total product life cycle (TPLC), but also in sustaining good relationships with customers and regulatory agencies.
Clinical trial monitoring for FDA-regulated products can be expensive and troublesome, but digital health technologies (DHTs) can make the process less painful and more cost-efficient. However, in order for clinical trial sponsors to enjoy these benefits, proper planning and execution will be necessary, according to a new FDA guidance for clinical trial monitoring.
This short, 6-page guidance casts a long shadow across the medical device landscape. The guidance states that the agency will reject an application that fails to provide adequate cybersecurity measures in premarket applications — just one of several recent developments that show just how serious the U.S. federal government is about cybersecurity.
There is a growing — and disconcerting — trend in which FDA resorts to regulation and lawmaking by fiat, overstepping the authority granted to it by Congress. Of particular concern are recent actions taken in regard to clinical decision support (CDS) software and laboratory-developed tests (LDTs).
The CDS Coalition has filed a citizen petition to have the FDA withdraw its final guidance for clinical decision support (CDS) software, a development that could prove essential to unlocking the market for these products.
Electronic Quality Management System
Enzyme eQMS is flexible and scalable, making it easy to use for startups, yet configurable to meet the needs of the most complex enterprise
